Message-ID: <20180528033212.bmtxq3zyujsf7x4a@shells.gnugeneration.com>
Date:   Sun, 27 May 2018 20:32:12 -0700
From:   Vito Caputo <vcaputo@...garu.com>
To:     linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Enric Balletbo Serra <eballetbo@...il.com>,
        Tim Murray <timmurray@...gle.com>, tj@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] (>= v4.12) IO w/dmcrypt causing audio underruns

On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 12:33:21AM -0800, vcaputo@...garu.com wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 11:57:32AM +0100, Enric Balletbo Serra wrote:
> > Hi Vito,
> > 
> > 2018-01-17 23:48 GMT+01:00  <vcaputo@...garu.com>:
> > > On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 10:25:33AM +0100, Enric Balletbo Serra wrote:
> > >> Hi Vito,
> > >>
> > >> 2017-12-01 22:33 GMT+01:00  <vcaputo@...garu.com>:
> > >> > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 10:39:19AM -0800, vcaputo@...garu.com wrote:
> > >> >> Hello,
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Recently I noticed substantial audio dropouts when listening to MP3s in
> > >> >> `cmus` while doing big and churny `git checkout` commands in my linux git
> > >> >> tree.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> It's not something I've done much of over the last couple months so I
> > >> >> hadn't noticed until yesterday, but didn't remember this being a problem in
> > >> >> recent history.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> As there's quite an accumulation of similarly configured and built kernels
> > >> >> in my grub menu, it was trivial to determine approximately when this began:
> > >> >>
> > >> >> 4.11.0: no dropouts
> > >> >> 4.12.0-rc7: dropouts
> > >> >> 4.14.0-rc6: dropouts (seem more substantial as well, didn't investigate)
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Watching top while this is going on in the various kernel versions, it's
> > >> >> apparent that the kworker behavior changed.  Both the priority and quantity
> > >> >> of running kworker threads is elevated in kernels experiencing dropouts.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Searching through the commit history for v4.11..v4.12 uncovered:
> > >> >>
> > >> >> commit a1b89132dc4f61071bdeaab92ea958e0953380a1
> > >> >> Author: Tim Murray <timmurray@...gle.com>
> > >> >> Date:   Fri Apr 21 11:11:36 2017 +0200
> > >> >>
> > >> >>     dm crypt: use WQ_HIGHPRI for the IO and crypt workqueues
> > >> >>
> > >> >>     Running dm-crypt with workqueues at the standard priority results in IO
> > >> >>     competing for CPU time with standard user apps, which can lead to
> > >> >>     pipeline bubbles and seriously degraded performance.  Move to using
> > >> >>     WQ_HIGHPRI workqueues to protect against that.
> > >> >>
> > >> >>     Signed-off-by: Tim Murray <timmurray@...gle.com>
> > >> >>     Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>
> > >> >>     Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> ---
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Reverting a1b8913 from 4.14.0-rc6, my current kernel, eliminates the
> > >> >> problem completely.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Looking at the diff in that commit, it looks like the commit message isn't
> > >> >> even accurate; not only is the priority of the dmcrypt workqueues being
> > >> >> changed - they're also being made "CPU intensive" workqueues as well.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> This combination appears to result in both elevated scheduling priority and
> > >> >> greater quantity of participant worker threads effectively starving any
> > >> >> normal priority user task under periods of heavy IO on dmcrypt volumes.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> I don't know what the right solution is here.  It seems to me we're lacking
> > >> >> the appropriate mechanism for charging CPU resources consumed on behalf of
> > >> >> user processes in kworker threads to the work-causing process.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> What effectively happens is my normal `git` user process is able to
> > >> >> greatly amplify what share of CPU it takes from the system by generating IO
> > >> >> on what happens to be a high-priority CPU-intensive storage volume.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> It looks potentially complicated to fix properly, but I suspect at its core
> > >> >> this may be a fairly longstanding shortcoming of the page cache and its
> > >> >> asynchronous design.  Something that has been exacerbated substantially by
> > >> >> the introduction of CPU-intensive storage subsystems like dmcrypt.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> If we imagine the whole stack simplified, where all the IO was being done
> > >> >> synchronously in-band, and the dmcrypt kernel code simply ran in the
> > >> >> IO-causing process context, it would be getting charged to the calling
> > >> >> process and scheduled accordingly.  The resource accounting and scheduling
> > >> >> problems all emerge with the page cache, buffered IO, and async background
> > >> >> writeback in a pool of unrelated worker threads, etc.  That's how it
> > >> >> appears to me anyways...
> > >> >>
> > >> >> The system used is a X61s Thinkpad 1.8Ghz with 840 EVO SSD, lvm on dmcrypt.
> > >> >> The kernel .config is attached in case it's of interest.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Thanks,
> > >> >> Vito Caputo
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > Ping...
> > >> >
> > >> > Could somebody please at least ACK receiving this so I'm not left wondering
> > >> > if my mails to lkml are somehow winding up flagged as spam, thanks!
> > >>
> > >> Sorry I did not notice your email before you ping me directly. It's
> > >> interesting that issue, though we didn't notice this problem. It's a
> > >> bit far since I tested this patch but I'll setup the environment again
> > >> and do more tests to understand better what is happening.
> > >>
> > >
> > > Any update on this?
> > >
> > 
> > I did not reproduce the issue for now. Can you try what happens if you
> > remove the WQ_CPU_INTENSIVE in the kcryptd_io workqueue?
> > 
> > - cc->io_queue = alloc_workqueue("kcryptd_io", WQ_HIGHPRI |
> > WQ_CPU_INTENSIVE | WQ_MEM_RECLAIM, 1);
> > cc->io_queue = alloc_workqueue("kcryptd_io", WQ_HIGHPRI | WQ_MEM_RECLAIM, 1);
> > 
> 
> FWIW if I change both "kcryptd" and "kcryptd_io" workqueues to just
> WQ_CPU_INTENSIVE, removing WQ_HIGHPRIO, the problem goes away.
> 
> Doing this to "kcryptd_io" alone, as mentioned in my previous email, was
> ineffective.
> 
> Perhaps revert just the WQ_HIGHPRIO bit from the dmcrypt workqueues?
> 


Guys... this is still a problem in 4.17-rc6.

I don't understand why this is being ignored.  It's pathetic, my laptop
can't even do a git checkout of the linux tree while playing mp3s
without the music skipping.

Reverting a1b8913 completely eliminates the problem.  What gives?

Regards,
Vito Caputo

Powered by blists - more mailing lists