[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180528165323.GC17505@ziepe.ca>
Date: Mon, 28 May 2018 10:53:23 -0600
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
To: "Wei Hu (Xavier)" <xavier.huwei@...wei.com>
Cc: dledford@...hat.com, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
lijun_nudt@....com, oulijun@...wei.com, charles.chenxin@...wei.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, leonro@...lanox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 rdma-next 4/4] RDMA/hns: Implement the
disassociate_ucontext API
On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 04:41:47PM +0800, Wei Hu (Xavier) wrote:
> This patch implemented the IB core disassociate_ucontext API.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Hu (Xavier) <xavier.huwei@...wei.com>
>
> v2->v3: Addressed the comments from Jason. The related link:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/5/22/967
> v1->v2: no change.
> drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_device.h | 8 ++++
> drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_main.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_device.h b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_device.h
> index da8512b..31221d5 100644
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_device.h
> @@ -217,11 +217,19 @@ struct hns_roce_uar {
> unsigned long logic_idx;
> };
>
> +struct hns_roce_vma_data {
> + struct list_head list;
> + struct vm_area_struct *vma;
> + struct mutex *vma_list_mutex;
> +};
This stuff is basically shared in all the drivers too - would it make
sense to maintain this information and do the zap_pte in the core code
as well?
There is no way to implement dis-associate without also doing the
zaps..
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists