linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] proc: prevent a task from writing on its own /proc/*/mem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJHCu1Ky09DWskcD4nVW5u1C5faWMv1A4kcxWzdiap7+G1SPkg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 28 May 2018 11:32:13 +0200
From:   Salvatore Mesoraca <s.mesoraca16@...il.com>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
        Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>,
        LSM List <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
        Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com>,
        Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] proc: prevent a task from writing on its own /proc/*/mem

2018-05-27 3:33 GMT+02:00 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>:
> On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 5:32 PM Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
>
>> I went through some old threads from 2012 when e268337dfe26 was
>> introduced, and later when things got looked at during DirtyCOW. There
>> was discussion about removing FOLL_FORCE (in order to block writes on
>> a read-only memory region).
>
> Side note, we did that for /dev/mem, and things broke.
>
> Thus commit f511c0b17b08 "Yes, people use FOLL_FORCE ;)"
>
> Side note, that very sam ecommit f511c0b17b08 is also the explanation for
> why the patch under discussion now seems broken.
>
> People really do use "write to /proc/self/mem" as a way to keep the
> mappings read-only, but have a way to change them when required.

Oh, I didn't expect this, interesting...
A configurable LSM is probably the right way to do this.

Thank you for your time,

Salvatore