[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180528100305.694320191@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 28 May 2018 12:03:37 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>,
Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>,
Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 288/329] f2fs: fix to check extent cache in f2fs_drop_extent_tree
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
[ Upstream commit bf617f7a92edc6bb2909db2bfa4576f50b280ee5 ]
If noextent_cache mount option is on, we will never initialize extent tree
in inode, but still we're going to access it in f2fs_drop_extent_tree,
result in kernel panic as below:
BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000038
IP: _raw_write_lock+0xc/0x30
Call Trace:
? f2fs_drop_extent_tree+0x41/0x70 [f2fs]
f2fs_fallocate+0x5a0/0xdd0 [f2fs]
? common_file_perm+0x47/0xc0
? apparmor_file_permission+0x1a/0x20
vfs_fallocate+0x15b/0x290
SyS_fallocate+0x44/0x70
do_syscall_64+0x6e/0x160
entry_SYSCALL64_slow_path+0x25/0x25
This patch fixes to check extent cache status before using in
f2fs_drop_extent_tree.
Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
--- a/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
@@ -647,6 +647,9 @@ void f2fs_drop_extent_tree(struct inode
struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = F2FS_I_SB(inode);
struct extent_tree *et = F2FS_I(inode)->extent_tree;
+ if (!f2fs_may_extent_tree(inode))
+ return;
+
set_inode_flag(inode, FI_NO_EXTENT);
write_lock(&et->lock);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists