[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180528100337.822073982@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 28 May 2018 12:03:34 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>, acme@...nel.org,
kernel test robot <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.14 429/496] perf/x86/intel: Properly save/restore the PMU state in the NMI handler
4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
[ Upstream commit 82d71ed0277efc45360828af8c4e4d40e1b45352 ]
The PMU is disabled in intel_pmu_handle_irq(), but cpuc->enabled is not updated
accordingly.
This is fine in current usage because no-one checks it - but fix it
for future code: for example, the drain_pebs() will be modified to
fix an auto-reload bug.
Properly save/restore the old PMU state.
Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>
Cc: acme@...nel.org
Cc: kernel test robot <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/6f44ee84-56f8-79f1-559b-08e371eaeb78@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
arch/x86/events/intel/core.c | 10 +++++++++-
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
@@ -2201,16 +2201,23 @@ static int intel_pmu_handle_irq(struct p
int bit, loops;
u64 status;
int handled;
+ int pmu_enabled;
cpuc = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events);
/*
+ * Save the PMU state.
+ * It needs to be restored when leaving the handler.
+ */
+ pmu_enabled = cpuc->enabled;
+ /*
* No known reason to not always do late ACK,
* but just in case do it opt-in.
*/
if (!x86_pmu.late_ack)
apic_write(APIC_LVTPC, APIC_DM_NMI);
intel_bts_disable_local();
+ cpuc->enabled = 0;
__intel_pmu_disable_all();
handled = intel_pmu_drain_bts_buffer();
handled += intel_bts_interrupt();
@@ -2320,7 +2327,8 @@ again:
done:
/* Only restore PMU state when it's active. See x86_pmu_disable(). */
- if (cpuc->enabled)
+ cpuc->enabled = pmu_enabled;
+ if (pmu_enabled)
__intel_pmu_enable_all(0, true);
intel_bts_enable_local();
Powered by blists - more mailing lists