linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.14 099/496] md raid10: fix NULL deference in handle_write

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180528100324.030465170@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 28 May 2018 11:58:04 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com>,
        Yufen Yu <yuyufen@...wei.com>,
        Shaohua Li <sh.li@...baba-inc.com>,
        Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.14 099/496] md raid10: fix NULL deference in handle_write_completed()

4.14-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Yufen Yu <yuyufen@...wei.com>

[ Upstream commit 01a69cab01c184d3786af09e9339311123d63d22 ]

In the case of 'recover', an r10bio with R10BIO_WriteError &
R10BIO_IsRecover will be progressed by handle_write_completed().
This function traverses all r10bio->devs[copies].
If devs[m].repl_bio != NULL, it thinks conf->mirrors[dev].replacement
is also not NULL. However, this is not always true.

When there is an rdev of raid10 has replacement, then each r10bio
->devs[m].repl_bio != NULL in conf->r10buf_pool. However, in 'recover',
even if corresponded replacement is NULL, it doesn't clear r10bio
->devs[m].repl_bio, resulting in replacement NULL deference.

This bug was introduced when replacement support for raid10 was
added in Linux 3.3.

As NeilBrown suggested:
	Elsewhere the determination of "is this device part of the
	resync/recovery" is made by resting bio->bi_end_io.
	If this is end_sync_write, then we tried to write here.
	If it is NULL, then we didn't try to write.

Fixes: 9ad1aefc8ae8 ("md/raid10:  Handle replacement devices during resync.")
Cc: stable (V3.3+)
Suggested-by: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: Yufen Yu <yuyufen@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <sh.li@...baba-inc.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/md/raid10.c |    6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/md/raid10.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid10.c
@@ -2625,7 +2625,8 @@ static void handle_write_completed(struc
 		for (m = 0; m < conf->copies; m++) {
 			int dev = r10_bio->devs[m].devnum;
 			rdev = conf->mirrors[dev].rdev;
-			if (r10_bio->devs[m].bio == NULL)
+			if (r10_bio->devs[m].bio == NULL ||
+				r10_bio->devs[m].bio->bi_end_io == NULL)
 				continue;
 			if (!r10_bio->devs[m].bio->bi_status) {
 				rdev_clear_badblocks(
@@ -2640,7 +2641,8 @@ static void handle_write_completed(struc
 					md_error(conf->mddev, rdev);
 			}
 			rdev = conf->mirrors[dev].replacement;
-			if (r10_bio->devs[m].repl_bio == NULL)
+			if (r10_bio->devs[m].repl_bio == NULL ||
+				r10_bio->devs[m].repl_bio->bi_end_io == NULL)
 				continue;
 
 			if (!r10_bio->devs[m].repl_bio->bi_status) {