[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180528100247.088236797@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 28 May 2018 12:01:46 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@...e.com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>,
Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.16 073/272] btrfs: Fix possible softlock on single core machines
4.16-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@...e.com>
[ Upstream commit 1e1c50a929bc9e49bc3f9935b92450d9e69f8158 ]
do_chunk_alloc implements a loop checking whether there is a pending
chunk allocation and if so causes the caller do loop. Generally this
loop is executed only once, however testing with btrfs/072 on a single
core vm machines uncovered an extreme case where the system could loop
indefinitely. This is due to a missing cond_resched when loop which
doesn't give a chance to the previous chunk allocator finish its job.
The fix is to simply add the missing cond_resched.
Fixes: 6d74119f1a3e ("Btrfs: avoid taking the chunk_mutex in do_chunk_alloc")
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@...e.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
@@ -4657,6 +4657,7 @@ again:
if (wait_for_alloc) {
mutex_unlock(&fs_info->chunk_mutex);
wait_for_alloc = 0;
+ cond_resched();
goto again;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists