[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180529180823.GA32763@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 14:08:23 -0400
From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
To: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>,
Shaohua Li <shli@...nel.org>, Alasdair Kergon <agk@...hat.com>,
dm-devel@...hat.com, Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@...rosoft.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Heinz Mauelshagen <heinzm@...hat.com>,
linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: dm-writecache: fix compilation issue with !DAX
On Tue, May 29 2018 at 1:52pm -0400,
Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> As reported by Arnd (https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/5/28/1697), dm-writecache
> will fail with link errors in configs where DAX isn't present:
>
> drivers/md/dm-writecache.o: In function `writecache_ctr':
> dm-writecache.c:(.text+0x1fdc): undefined reference to `dax_read_lock'
> dm-writecache.c:(.text+0x2004): undefined reference to `dax_direct_access'
> dm-writecache.c:(.text+0x21cc): undefined reference to `dax_read_unlock'
>
> Fix this by following the lead of the other DM modules and wrapping calls
> to the generic DAX code in #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DAX_DRIVER) blocks.
>
> We also expand the failure case for the 'p' (persistent memory) flag so
> that fails on both architectures that don't support persistent memory and
> on kernels that don't have DAX support configured. This prevents us from
> ever hitting the BUG() in the persistent_memory_claim() stub.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>
> Reported-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Thanks, I've picked this up.
Mike
Powered by blists - more mailing lists