[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180529175513.s7iju6rkoya3hvsf@linux-n805>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 10:55:13 -0700
From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
tgraf@...g.ch, manfred@...orfullife.com,
guillaume.knispel@...ersonicimagine.com, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] lib/rhashtable: guarantee initial hashtable
allocation
On Wed, 30 May 2018, Herbert Xu wrote:
>On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 09:42:31AM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
>>
>> For the sake of simplicity, Linus suggested directly using HASH_MIN_SIZE
>> such that we have a single fallback.
>
>Where did he suggest that?
https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/5/24/1265
Powered by blists - more mailing lists