linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv2 0/2] Add new SEV commands

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <69cd82ba-d60d-d3f8-37ee-ef4cd769f611@redhat.com>
Date:   Tue, 29 May 2018 20:46:03 +0200
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:     Janakarajan Natarajan <Janakarajan.Natarajan@....com>,
        linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
        Gary Hook <gary.hook@....com>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/2] Add new SEV commands

On 25/05/2018 22:23, Janakarajan Natarajan wrote:
> This patchset adds two new SEV commands, introduced in SEV API v0.15
> and v0.16 respectively.
> 
> * DOWNLOAD_FIRMWARE allows the SEV firmware to be updated if a blob newer
>   than or similar to the exisiting build is available.
> 
> * GET_ID allows to query for a unique ID that can be used to retrieve the
>   Chip Endorsment Key (CEK) public key signed by the AMD SEV Signing Key
>   (ASK). 
> 
> v1->v2:
> * Added cover letter.
> * Misc changes based on Boris' feedback.
> 
> Janakarajan Natarajan (2):
>   crypto: ccp: Add DOWNLOAD_FIRMWARE SEV command
>   crypto: ccp: Add GET_ID SEV command
> 
>  drivers/crypto/ccp/psp-dev.c | 143 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  drivers/crypto/ccp/psp-dev.h |   4 ++
>  include/linux/psp-sev.h      |  23 +++++++
>  include/uapi/linux/psp-sev.h |  12 ++++
>  4 files changed, 172 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 

This is not going through the KVM tree, is it?

Thanks,

Paolo