[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <BBE1C638-60BE-4F73-820C-D1E1EFBD33E3@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 16:19:34 -0300
From: Rafael Tinoco <rafael.tinoco@...aro.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>,
Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux- stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>, patches@...nelci.org,
lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.16 000/272] 4.16.13-stable review
The following bug has been opened for LTP:
https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/issues/319
for the CVE-2017-5669's wrong assumptions (based on Davidlohr's work).
I'll change the test to cover both scenarios and expect the right results from them.
> On 29 May 2018, at 04:08, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 10:55:34AM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
>> On 28 May 2018 at 15:30, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.16.13 release.
>>> There are 272 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>>> let me know.
>>>
>>> Responses should be made by Wed May 30 10:01:02 UTC 2018.
>>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>>
>>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>>> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.16.13-rc1.gz
>>> or in the git tree and branch at:
>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.16.y
>>> and the diffstat can be found below.
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>>
>>> greg k-h
>>
>> Results from Linaro’s test farm.
>> No regressions on arm64, arm and x86_64.
>>
>> NOTE:
>> The failed LTP test case "cve-2017-5669" is a waiver here.
>
> Thanks for figuring that one out :)
>
> Also, thanks for testing all of these and letting me know.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists