[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180529050833.GA226378@joelaf.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date: Mon, 28 May 2018 22:08:33 -0700
From: Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>
To: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>, peterz@...radead.org,
mingo@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rjw@...ysocki.net,
dietmar.eggemann@....com, Morten.Rasmussen@....com,
viresh.kumar@...aro.org, valentin.schneider@....com,
quentin.perret@....com, Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@...tannapisa.it>,
Claudio Scordino <claudio@...dence.eu.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>,
Alessio Balsini <alessio.balsini@...tannapisa.it>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 05/10] cpufreq/schedutil: get max utilization
On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 12:12:34PM +0200, Juri Lelli wrote:
[..]
> > +
> > + util = max_t(unsigned long, util, READ_ONCE(rq->avg_dl.util_avg));
> > +
> > + return util;
>
> Anyway, just a quick thought. I guess we should experiment with this a
> bit. Now, I don't unfortunately have a Arm platform at hand for testing.
> Claudio, Luca (now Cc-ed), would you be able to fire some tests with
> this change?
>
> Oh, adding Joel and Alessio as well that experimented with DEADLINE
> lately.
I also feel that for power reasons, dl.util_avg shouldn't drive the OPP
beyond what the running bandwidth is, or atleast do that only if CFS tasks
are running and being preempted as you/Vincent mentioned in one of the
threads.
With our DL experiments, I didn't measure power but got it to a point where
the OPP is scaling correctly based on DL parameters. I think Alessio did
measure power at his setup but I can't recall now. Alessio?
thanks,
- Joel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists