| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 16:52:04 -0500
From: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@....com>, austinwc@...eaurora.org,
tnowicki@...iumnetworks.com, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com>,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, Morten.Rasmussen@....com,
vkilari@...eaurora.org,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@....com>,
jhugo@...eaurora.org, Al Stone <ahs3@...hat.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>, wangxiongfeng2@...wei.com,
Dietmar Eggemann <Dietmar.Eggemann@....com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 00/12] Support PPTT for ARM64
Hi,
On 05/29/2018 10:51 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Will,
>
> On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 5:08 PM, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com> wrote:
>> On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 02:18:40PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>>> On 29/05/18 12:56, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>>> On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 1:14 PM, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com> wrote:
>>>>> On 29/05/18 11:48, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>>>>> System supend still works fine on systems with big cores only:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> R-Car H3 ES1.0 (4xCA57 (4xCA53 disabled in firmware))
>>>>>> R-Car M3-N (2xCA57)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Reverting this commit fixes the issue for me.
>>>>>
>>>>> I can't find anything that relates to system suspend in these patches
>>>>> unless they are messing with something during CPU hot plug-in back
>>>>> during resume.
>>>>
>>>> It's only the last patch that introduces the breakage.
>>>>
>>>
>>> As specified in the commit log, it won't change any behavior for DT
>>> systems if it's non-NUMA or single node system. So I am still wondering
>>> what could trigger this regression.
>>
>> I wonder if we're somehow giving an uninitialised/invalid NUMA configuration
>> to the scheduler, although I can't see how this would happen.
>>
>> Geert -- if you enable CONFIG_DEBUG_PER_CPU_MAPS=y and apply the diff below
>> do you see anything shouting in dmesg?
>
> Thanks, but unfortunately it doesn't help.
> I added some debug code to print cpumask, but so far I don't see anything
> suspicious.
I suspect most of the problem is related to the node mask changing at
unexpected times (particularly cores being removed from the mask). Once
I understand that more, there may be a simpler patch.
OTOH, I've been testing with this, and with it, I can't seem to
duplicate the problem with CONFIG_NUMA disabled I found.
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/topology.h
b/arch/arm64/include/asm/topology.h
index df48212f767b..7450ef5ed733 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/topology.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/topology.h
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ struct cpu_topology {
cpumask_t thread_sibling;
cpumask_t core_sibling;
cpumask_t llc_siblings;
+ cpumask_t node_siblings; /* maintain a stable node sibling list */
};
extern struct cpu_topology cpu_topology[NR_CPUS];
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
index f3e2e3aec0b0..f4eb80852d78 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
@@ -677,8 +677,9 @@ void __init smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus)
init_cpu_topology();
this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
- store_cpu_topology(this_cpu);
numa_store_cpu_info(this_cpu);
+ store_cpu_topology(this_cpu);
+
/*
* If UP is mandated by "nosmp" (which implies "maxcpus=0"),
don't set
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
index 7415c166281f..6819c764537d 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
@@ -215,7 +215,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpu_topology);
const struct cpumask *cpu_coregroup_mask(int cpu)
{
- const cpumask_t *core_mask = cpumask_of_node(cpu_to_node(cpu));
+ const cpumask_t *core_mask = &cpu_topology[cpu].node_siblings;
/* Find the smaller of NUMA, core or LLC siblings */
if (cpumask_subset(&cpu_topology[cpu].core_sibling, core_mask)) {
@@ -233,12 +233,16 @@ const struct cpumask *cpu_coregroup_mask(int cpu)
static void update_siblings_masks(unsigned int cpuid)
{
struct cpu_topology *cpu_topo, *cpuid_topo = &cpu_topology[cpuid];
+ int node = cpu_to_node(cpuid);
int cpu;
/* update core and thread sibling masks */
for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
cpu_topo = &cpu_topology[cpu];
+ if (cpu_to_node(cpu) == node)
+ cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &cpu_topo->node_siblings);
+
if (cpuid_topo->llc_id == cpu_topo->llc_id)
cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &cpuid_topo->llc_siblings);
@@ -311,6 +315,9 @@ static void __init reset_cpu_topology(void)
cpumask_clear(&cpu_topo->llc_siblings);
cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &cpu_topo->llc_siblings);
+ cpumask_clear(&cpu_topo->node_siblings);
+ cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &cpu_topo->node_siblings);
+
cpumask_clear(&cpu_topo->core_sibling);
cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &cpu_topo->core_sibling);
cpumask_clear(&cpu_topo->thread_sibling);
--
2.14.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists