linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.16 000/272] 4.16.13-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+G9fYu1NuW6vB+bHEsYSmyJAB27kw8vP=0uwhVR962Yq4C43g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 29 May 2018 10:55:34 +0530
From:   Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
        Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>,
        linux- stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, dave@...olabs.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.16 000/272] 4.16.13-stable review

On 28 May 2018 at 15:30, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.16.13 release.
> There are 272 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed May 30 10:01:02 UTC 2018.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.16.13-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.16.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm and x86_64.

NOTE:
The failed LTP test case "cve-2017-5669" is a waiver here.

Summary
------------------------------------------------------------------------

kernel: 4.16.13-rc1
git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
git branch: linux-4.16.y
git commit: ca67f014e67013cd3d8312e68d2967332dae8654
git describe: v4.16.12-273-gca67f014e670
Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-4.16-oe/build/v4.16.12-273-gca67f014e670


No regressions (compared to build v4.16.12-271-g2cb370dedebb)


Ran 10312 total tests in the following environments and test suites.

Environments
--------------
- dragonboard-410c - arm64
- hi6220-hikey - arm64
- juno-r2 - arm64
- qemu_arm
- qemu_arm64
- qemu_x86_64
- x15 - arm
- x86_64

Test Suites
-----------
* boot
* kselftest
* libhugetlbfs
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests
* ltp-containers-tests
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests
* ltp-fs-tests
* ltp-fs_bind-tests
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests
* ltp-fsx-tests
* ltp-hugetlb-tests
* ltp-io-tests
* ltp-ipc-tests
* ltp-math-tests
* ltp-nptl-tests
* ltp-pty-tests
* ltp-sched-tests
* ltp-securebits-tests
* ltp-timers-tests
* ltp-cve-tests
* ltp-filecaps-tests
* ltp-syscalls-tests
* kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native
* kselftest-vsyscall-mode-none

-- 
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org