linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] async

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAPcyv4jrUwXFrF7aB-bKqfZ=17T5ie27KEO0JYWD=ETAqOqA4g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 29 May 2018 15:40:50 -0700
From:   Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To:     Kyle Spiers <ksspiers@...gle.com>
Cc:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, ray.jui@...adcom.com,
        linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-raid <linux-raid@...r.kernel.org>, vkoul@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] async_pq: Remove VLA usage

[ add Vinod's korg address ]

On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 3:37 PM, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com> wrote:
> [ adding linux-raid ]
>
> Apologies for the delay, the recent ping from Kees made me take a closer look.
>
> On Sat, May 5, 2018 at 12:58 AM, Kyle Spiers <ksspiers@...gle.com> wrote:
>> In the quest to remove VLAs from the kernel[1], this moves the
>> allocation of coefs and blocks from the stack to being kmalloc()ed.
>>
>> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/3/7/621
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kyle Spiers <ksspiers@...gle.com>
>> ---
>> Forgot to add slab.h
>> ---
>>  crypto/async_tx/async_pq.c  | 18 ++++++++++++++----
>>  crypto/async_tx/raid6test.c |  9 ++++++++-
>>  2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/crypto/async_tx/async_pq.c b/crypto/async_tx/async_pq.c
>> index 56bd612927ab..af1912313a23 100644
>> --- a/crypto/async_tx/async_pq.c
>> +++ b/crypto/async_tx/async_pq.c
>> @@ -194,9 +194,9 @@ async_gen_syndrome(struct page **blocks, unsigned int offset, int disks,
>>             (src_cnt <= dma_maxpq(device, 0) ||
>>              dma_maxpq(device, DMA_PREP_CONTINUE) > 0) &&
>>             is_dma_pq_aligned(device, offset, 0, len)) {
>> -               struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *tx;
>> +               struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *tx = NULL;
>>                 enum dma_ctrl_flags dma_flags = 0;
>> -               unsigned char coefs[src_cnt];
>> +               unsigned char *coefs;
>>                 int i, j;
>>
>>                 /* run the p+q asynchronously */
>> @@ -207,6 +207,9 @@ async_gen_syndrome(struct page **blocks, unsigned int offset, int disks,
>>                  * sources and update the coefficients accordingly
>>                  */
>>                 unmap->len = len;
>> +               coefs = kmalloc_array(src_cnt, sizeof(*coefs), GFP_KERNEL);
>
> At a minimum this needs to be GFP_NOIO since raid may be in the
> page-reclaim path.
>
> However, I think it may be better to allocate this with the rest of
> the stripe resources and pass it in as a scratch buffer. See the usage
> / implementation of scribble_alloc() in drivers/md/raid5.c.