[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180529070915.GF5666@vkoul-mobl>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 12:39:15 +0530
From: Vinod <vkoul@...nel.org>
To: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Cc: Frank Mori Hess <fmh6jj@...il.com>, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
r.baldyga@...kerion.com, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
Linux Samsung SOC <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Revert "dmaengine: pl330: add DMA_PAUSE feature"
On 29-05-18, 07:17, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> Hi Vinod,
>
> On 2018-05-18 09:21, Vinod wrote:
> > On 18-05-18, 08:28, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> >> Hi Vinod,
> >>
> >> Okay, I see that in theory, there are some tricky bits in implementing DMA
> >> support in UART drivers. On the other hand there are already drivers
> >> with seems
> >> to be working fine. This discussion is about revert of the feature
> >> present in
> >> pl330 driver, which is required by other in-kernel driver without proper
> >> fix to
> >> them.
> >>
> >> Can we drop it for now and discuss what and how should be implemented to
> >> make
> >> everyone happy, without any regressions?
> > Sure am dropping the revert, we can always bring it back if it is required
>
> This revert is still in your -next branch. Do you plan to update it as well?
I dont send it to linus and merge topic/* into for-linus and send. It gets
updated on rebase on -rc1.
--
~Vinod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists