[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180529073958.GB4790@dell>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 08:39:58 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>
Cc: mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
mark.rutland@....com, lgirdwood@...il.com, broonie@...nel.org,
mazziesaccount@...il.com, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mikko.mutanen@...rohmeurope.com, heikki.haikola@...rohmeurope.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] mfd/regulator/clk: bd71837: ROHM BD71837 PMIC
driver
On Mon, 28 May 2018, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
> Patch series adding support for ROHM BD71837 PMIC.
>
> BD71837 is a programmable Power Management IC for powering single-core,
> dual-core, and quad-core SoC’s such as NXP-i.MX 8M. It is optimized for
> low BOM cost and compact solution footprint. It integrates 8 buck
> regulators and 7 LDO’s to provide all the power rails required by the
> SoC and the commonly used peripherals.
>
> The driver aims to not limit the usage of PMIC. Thus the buck and LDO
> naming is generic and not tied to any specific purposes. However there
> is following limitations which make it mostly suitable for use cases
> where the processor where PMIC driver is running is powered by the PMIC:
>
> - The PMIC is not re-initialized if it resets. PMIC may reset as a
> result of voltage monitoring (over/under voltage) or due to reset
> request. Driver is only initializing PMIC at probe. This is not
> problem as long as processor controlling PMIC is powered by PMIC.
>
> - The PMIC internal state machine is ignored by driver. Driver assumes
> the PMIC is wired so that it is always in "run" state when controlled
> by the driver.
FYI, this patch-set is going to be difficult to manage since it was
not sent 'threaded'. As people start replying to different patches,
they are going to scatter-bomb throughout all of the recipient's
inboxes.
If/when you send a subsequent version, could you please ensure you
send the set threaded so the patches keep in relation to one another
as they are reviewed?
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists