[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180529074659.GC4790@dell>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 08:46:59 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>
Cc: Steve Twiss <stwiss.opensource@...semi.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@...il.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
"linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] mfd: da9063: Add DA9063L support
On Thu, 24 May 2018, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 05/24/2018 02:32 PM, Steve Twiss wrote:
> > On 24 May 2018 @ 12:49 Steve Twiss wrote:
[...]
> > static const struct regmap_irq da9063l_irqs[] = {
> > /* DA9063 event A register */
> > [DA9063L_IRQ_ONKEY] = {
> > .reg_offset = DA9063_REG_EVENT_A_OFFSET,
> > .mask = DA9063_M_ONKEY,
> > },
[...]
> > [DA9063L_IRQ_GPI15] = {
> > .reg_offset = DA9063_REG_EVENT_D_OFFSET,
> > .mask = DA9063_M_GPI15,
> > },
> > };
>
> We can probably do the same trick with the regmaps and irqmaps as with
> the rest, that is, reorder them and register only a smaller portion ?
Please also consider using REGMAP_IRQ_REG().
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists