[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180529084502.hltdpojgnkjieaaj@mwanda>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 11:45:03 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Auger Eric <eric.auger@...hat.com>
Cc: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vfio/pci: remove a bogus cast in vfio_msi_set_block()
On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 09:27:18PM +0200, Auger Eric wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> On 05/28/2018 09:47 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > This cast is confusing... The "start" variable is an unsigned int. We
> > absolutely do not want to cast it to a negative int so why is the cast
> > there? It turns out, when you look at the context, it's a no-op and we
> > can just remove it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_intrs.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_intrs.c
> > index 1c46045b0e7f..2724fed62129 100644
> > --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_intrs.c
> > +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_intrs.c
> > @@ -368,7 +368,7 @@ static int vfio_msi_set_block(struct vfio_pci_device *vdev, unsigned start,
> > }
> >
> > if (ret) {
> > - for (--j; j >= (int)start; j--)
> > + for (--j; j >= start; j--)
> I think this was done one purpose as j can be -1 while start is an
> unsigned.
>
Oh, wow... Yeah. Sorry. I didn't think that through. I will create
a static checker warning so this particular bug doesn't happen to me
again.
regards,
dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists