[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180529130948.GC30119@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 15:09:48 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Oleksandr Shamray <oleksandrs@...lanox.com>
Cc: arnd@...db.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org, joel@....id.au, jiri@...nulli.us,
tklauser@...tanz.ch, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
vadimp@...lanox.com, system-sw-low-level@...lanox.com,
robh+dt@...nel.org, openocd-devel-owner@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, mchehab@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [patch v23 1/4] drivers: jtag: Add JTAG core driver
On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 02:49:02PM +0300, Oleksandr Shamray wrote:
> +static int jtag_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
If you do not do anything, then there is no need to have this callback
at all, right?
> +/**
> + * enum jtag_endstate:
> + *
> + * @JTAG_STATE_IDLE: JTAG state machine IDLE state
> + * @JTAG_STATE_PAUSEIR: JTAG state machine PAUSE_IR state
> + * @JTAG_STATE_PAUSEDR: JTAG state machine PAUSE_DR state
> + */
> +enum jtag_endstate {
> + JTAG_STATE_IDLE,
> + JTAG_STATE_PAUSEIR,
> + JTAG_STATE_PAUSEDR,
Be specific with these enums, set them to a value so you know all is
good. Userspace C compilers can be funny at times.
Otherwise, looks really good, nice work.
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists