linux-kernel - RE: [GIT PULL 16/20] lightnvm: error handling when whole line is bad

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <76C92B909A93A84C99173B331AB578DAC7AB5252@irsmsx111.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 29 May 2018 13:15:42 +0000
From:   "Konopko, Igor J" <igor.j.konopko@...el.com>
To:     Javier Gonzalez <javier@...xlabs.com>,
        Matias Bjorling <mb@...htnvm.io>
CC:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>,
        "linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Dziegielewski, Marcin" <marcin.dziegielewski@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [GIT PULL 16/20] lightnvm: error handling when whole line is bad

> From: Javier Gonzalez [mailto:javier@...xlabs.com]
> This case cannot occur on the only user of the function
> (pblk_recov_l2p()). On the previous check (pblk_line_was_written()), we
> verify the state of the line and the position of the first good chunk. In
> the case of a bad line (less chunks than a given threshold to allow
> emeta), the recovery will not be carried out in the line.
You are right. It looks that during my testing there was some inconsistency between chunks state table which is verified inside pblk_line_was_written() and blk_bitmap which was read from emeta and is verified in pblk_line_smeta_start(). I'm living decision to maintainers whether we should keep this sanity check or not - it really just pass gracefully the result from pblk_line_smeta_start() where similar sanity check is present.

Igor