[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180529145055.GA15148@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 07:50:55 -0700
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@...il.com>
Cc: viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, hughd@...gle.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mhocko@...e.com,
ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com, zi.yan@...rutgers.edu,
kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com, dan.j.williams@...el.com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, mark.rutland@....com, riel@...hat.com,
pasha.tatashin@...cle.com, jschoenh@...zon.de,
kstewart@...uxfoundation.org, rientjes@...gle.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org, mgorman@...e.de,
yang.s@...baba-inc.com, minchan@...nel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: Change return type to vm_fault_t
On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 08:01:26PM +0530, Souptick Joarder wrote:
> Use new return type vm_fault_t for fault handler. For
> now, this is just documenting that the function returns
> a VM_FAULT value rather than an errno. Once all instances
> are converted, vm_fault_t will become a distinct type.
I don't believe you've checked this with sparse.
> @@ -802,7 +802,8 @@ int fixup_user_fault(struct task_struct *tsk, struct mm_struct *mm,
> bool *unlocked)
> {
> struct vm_area_struct *vma;
> - int ret, major = 0;
> + int major = 0;
> + vm_fault_t ret;
>
> if (unlocked)
> fault_flags |= FAULT_FLAG_ALLOW_RETRY;
...
major |= ret & VM_FAULT_MAJOR;
That should be throwing a warning.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists