[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180529154346.3168-15-mark.rutland@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 16:43:44 +0100
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Subject: [PATCHv2 14/16] atomics/treewide: remove atomic_inc_not_zero_hint()
While documentation suggests atomic_inc_not_zero_hint() will perform better
than atomic_inc_not_zero(), this is unlikely to be the case. No architectures
implement atomic_inc_not_zero_hint() directly, and thus it either falls back to
atomic_inc_not_zero(), or a loop using atomic_cmpxchg().
Whenever the hint does not match the value in memory, the repeated use of
atomic_cmpxchg() will be more expensive than the read that
atomic_inc_not_zero_hint() attempts to avoid. For architectures with LL/SC
atomics, a read cannot be avoided, and it would always be better to use
atomic_inc_not_zero() directly. For other architectures, their own
atomic_inc_not_zero() is likely to be more optimal than an atomic_cmpxchg()
loop regardless.
Generally, atomic_inc_not_zero_hint() is liable to perform worse than
atomic_inc_not_zero(). Further, atomic_inc_not_zero_hint() only exists
for atomic_t, and not atomic64_t or atomic_long_t, and there is only one
user in the kernel tree.
Given all this, let's remove atomic_inc_not_zero_hint(), and migrate the
existing user over to atomic_inc_not_zero().
There should be no functional change as a result of this patch.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
---
include/linux/atomic.h | 32 --------------------------------
net/atm/pppoatm.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 33 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/atomic.h b/include/linux/atomic.h
index 7d41b6fffab6..8ec4d120b264 100644
--- a/include/linux/atomic.h
+++ b/include/linux/atomic.h
@@ -656,38 +656,6 @@ static inline int atomic_fetch_andnot_release(int i, atomic_t *v)
}
#endif
-/**
- * atomic_inc_not_zero_hint - increment if not null
- * @v: pointer of type atomic_t
- * @hint: probable value of the atomic before the increment
- *
- * This version of atomic_inc_not_zero() gives a hint of probable
- * value of the atomic. This helps processor to not read the memory
- * before doing the atomic read/modify/write cycle, lowering
- * number of bus transactions on some arches.
- *
- * Returns: 0 if increment was not done, 1 otherwise.
- */
-#ifndef atomic_inc_not_zero_hint
-static inline int atomic_inc_not_zero_hint(atomic_t *v, int hint)
-{
- int val, c = hint;
-
- /* sanity test, should be removed by compiler if hint is a constant */
- if (!hint)
- return atomic_inc_not_zero(v);
-
- do {
- val = atomic_cmpxchg(v, c, c + 1);
- if (val == c)
- return 1;
- c = val;
- } while (c);
-
- return 0;
-}
-#endif
-
#ifndef atomic_inc_unless_negative
static inline int atomic_inc_unless_negative(atomic_t *p)
{
diff --git a/net/atm/pppoatm.c b/net/atm/pppoatm.c
index 21d9d341a619..a4d82afd4586 100644
--- a/net/atm/pppoatm.c
+++ b/net/atm/pppoatm.c
@@ -244,7 +244,7 @@ static int pppoatm_may_send(struct pppoatm_vcc *pvcc, int size)
* the packet count limit, so...
*/
if (atm_may_send(pvcc->atmvcc, size) &&
- atomic_inc_not_zero_hint(&pvcc->inflight, NONE_INFLIGHT))
+ atomic_inc_not_zero(&pvcc->inflight))
return 1;
/*
--
2.11.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists