[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0dd9d6dc-6cb3-157c-33ac-8c3e449a3859@landley.net>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2018 17:36:45 -0500
From: Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>
To: Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>,
Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@...il.com>
Cc: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>,
Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>,
Matt Turner <mattst88@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
James Hogan <jhogan@...nel.org>,
"James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@...isc-linux.org>,
Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>,
Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>,
Cao jin <caoj.fnst@...fujitsu.com>,
Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>,
linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org,
linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kbuild: add machine size to CHEKCFLAGS
On 05/30/2018 05:00 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
> What about the architectures not touched by your patch that previously
> had no -m32/-m64? (arc, c6x, h8300, hexagon, m68k, microblaze, nds32,
> nios2, openrisc, powerpc, riscv, s390, sh, unicore32, xtensa)
>
> You forgot to CC them on this patch.
A) He cc'd arch/sh on the previous patch earlier today, to which I replied:
https://marc.info/?l=linux-sh&m=152769132515226&w=2
B) Every change to common infrastructure should cc: every arch? Really? So like
filesystem changes and stuff to?
> Have you really checked that all their toolchains support the -m32/-m64
> flags you newly introduce for them? Apart from non-biarch architectures,
> I'm thinking of 31-bit s390 as a corner case where !64 != 32.
1) Last I heard Linux implements lp64:
http://www.unix.org/whitepapers/64bit.html
2) it's unlikely to be worse than it was before the patch,
3) last I checked https://github.com/landley/mkroot boots to an s390 shell
prompt under qemu, although I haven't tried building with this patch. (And you
may still need to add HOST_EXTRA='lex yacc bison flex' to the command line
unless they've re-added the _shipped versions like the old kconfig had...) Point
is, shouldn't be too hard to test it. Presumably that's why we have an -rc1 and
then 6 more -rc versions each release...
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists