[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKv+Gu-FvWoDbMV2veh8BzW7ihbvaw-cd+rK5x_TLq0UC99FNg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2018 08:07:10 +0200
From: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: nixiaoming <nixiaoming@...wei.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Kristina Martsenko <kristina.martsenko@....com>,
Steve Capper <steve.capper@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
zhang.jia@...ux.alibaba.com,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86:add missing CONFIG_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX for mark_rodata_ro
On 30 May 2018 at 07:58, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> * nixiaoming <nixiaoming@...wei.com> wrote:
>
>> mark_rodata_ro is only called by the function mark_readonly
>> when CONFIG_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX=y
>>
>> if CONFIG_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX is not set
>> a compile warning may be triggered: unused function
>>
>> Signed-off-by: nixiaoming <nixiaoming@...wei.com>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/mm/init_32.c | 2 ++
>> arch/x86/mm/init_64.c | 2 ++
>> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/init_32.c b/arch/x86/mm/init_32.c
>> index c893c6a..121c567 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/mm/init_32.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/init_32.c
>> @@ -920,6 +920,7 @@ static void mark_nxdata_nx(void)
>> set_pages_nx(virt_to_page(start), size >> PAGE_SHIFT);
>> }
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX
>> void mark_rodata_ro(void)
>> {
>> unsigned long start = PFN_ALIGN(_text);
>> @@ -957,3 +958,4 @@ void mark_rodata_ro(void)
>> if (__supported_pte_mask & _PAGE_NX)
>> debug_checkwx();
>> }
>> +#endif /*end of CONFIG_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX*/
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
>> index 0a40060..1b7a1a7 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
>> @@ -1245,6 +1245,7 @@ void set_kernel_text_ro(void)
>> set_memory_ro(start, (end - start) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
>> }
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX
>> void mark_rodata_ro(void)
>> {
>> unsigned long start = PFN_ALIGN(_text);
>> @@ -1298,6 +1299,7 @@ void mark_rodata_ro(void)
>> */
>> pti_clone_kernel_text();
>> }
>> +#endif
>
> NAK, this is very ugly and the changelog doesn't appear to be true: the build
> warning does not trigger in the default build, correct?
>
I don't see how the build warning could trigger at all, given that
mark_rodata_ro() has external linkage.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists