[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <0E56560E-F577-43A6-9F18-B7AC7B5DB213@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2018 09:32:02 +0200
From: Håkon Bugge <haakon.bugge@...cle.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
Cc: Hans Westgaard Ry <hans.westgaard.ry@...cle.com>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
Jack Morgenstein <jackm@....mellanox.co.il>,
Daniel Jurgens <danielj@...lanox.com>,
Parav Pandit <parav@...lanox.com>,
Pravin Shedge <pravin.shedge4linux@...il.com>,
OFED mailing list <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IB/mad: Use ID allocator routines to allocate agent
number
> On 29 May 2018, at 18:40, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca> wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 06:16:14PM +0200, Håkon Bugge wrote:
>>
>>> On 29 May 2018, at 17:49, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 09:38:08AM +0200, Hans Westgaard Ry wrote:
>>>> The agent TID is a 64 bit value split in two dwords. The least
>>>> significant dword is the TID running counter. The most significant
>>>> dword is the agent number. In the CX-3 shared port model, the mlx4
>>>> driver uses the most significant byte of the agent number to store the
>>>> slave number, making agent numbers greater and equal to 2^24 (3 bytes)
>>>> unusable.
>>>
>>> There is no reason for this to be an ida, just do something like
>>>
>>> mad_agent_priv->agent.hi_tid = atomic_inc_return(&ib_mad_client_id) & mad_agent_priv->ib_dev->tid_mask;
>>>
>>> And have the driver set tid_mask to 3 bytes of 0xFF
>>
>> The issue is that some of the mad agents are long-lived, so you will
>> wrap and use the same TID twice.
>
> We already have that problem, and using ida is problematic because we
> need to maximize the time between TID re-use, which ida isn't doing.
Initially, I thought that too, but consulted the spec which states:
C13-18.1.1: When initiating a new operation, MADHeader:TransactionID
shall be set to such a value that within that MAD the combination of TID,
SGID, and MgmtClass is different from that of any other currently executing
operation. []
"currently executing operation" that is.
But if timeouts etc. leads to MAD floating around in the fabric, its of course more robust to maximize the time between reuse.
Then idr_alloc_cyclic() can be used.
> Preventing re-use seems like a seperate issue from limiting the range
> to be compatible with mlx4.
Yes. But a v2 of Hans' patch using idr_alloc_cyclic() solves both issues.
Thxs, Håkon
>
> Jason
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists