[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c9698153b17ca6c6dab6a00cb1f0928e@codeaurora.org>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2018 01:22:10 -0700
From: okaya@...eaurora.org
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
timur@...eaurora.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Christoffer Dall <cdall@...aro.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com>,
Thymo van Beers <thymovanbeers@...il.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>,
Dongdong Liu <liudongdong3@...wei.com>,
Frederick Lawler <fred@...dlawl.com>,
Oza Pawandeep <poza@...eaurora.org>,
Gabriele Paoloni <gabriele.paoloni@...wei.com>,
"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-pci-owner@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: Add pci=safemode option
On 2018-05-30 00:56, okaya@...eaurora.org wrote:
> On 2018-05-30 00:48, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 12:44:29AM -0700, okaya@...eaurora.org wrote:
>>> On 2018-05-30 00:37, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>> > On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 09:41:33PM -0700, Sinan Kaya wrote:
>>> > > Bjorn and I discussed the need for such a "safe" mode feature when you
>>> > > want to bring up PCI for a platform. You want to turn off everything
>>> > > as
>>> > > a starter and just stick to bare minimum.
>>> >
>>> > Can we please make it a config option the instead of adding code
>>> > to every kernel? Also maybe the bringup should be in the name
>>> > to make this more clear?
>>>
>>> One other requirement was to have a runtime option rather than
>>> compile time
>>> option.
>>>
>>> When someone reported a problem, we wanted to be able to say "use
>>> this
>>> option and see if system boots" without doing any bisects or
>>> recompilation.
>>>
>>> This would be the first step in troubleshooting a system to see if
>>> fundamental features are working.
>>
>> That makes sense, people can not rebuild their kernels for the most
>> part. Putting it behind a config option would not make sense as it
>> would always have to be enabled.
>>
>
> Here is where the discussion took place. Last 5-10 messages should
> help.
>
>
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=196197
>
Some more paper trail for general awareness.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/5/3/509
>
>>> I don't mind changing the name Bjorn mentioned safe option. I made it
>>> safemode. I am looking at Bjorn for suggestions at this moment.
>>
>> "minimal"? "basic"? "crippled"?
>> "my_hardware_is_so_borked_it_needs_this_option"? :)
>>
>> Naming is hard...
>>
>> greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists