[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <76bd29b8-c8af-b5ac-3538-b6a97afb6ab1@codeaurora.org>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2018 15:57:02 +0530
From: Mukesh Ojha <mojha@...eaurora.org>
To: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, neeraju@...eaurora.org,
gkohli@...eaurora.org, cpandya@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] time: Fix sleeptime injection for non-stop
clocksource & persistent clock
Hi John,
On 5/30/2018 7:50 AM, John Stultz wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 2:49 AM, Mukesh Ojha <mojha@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>> Currently, for both non-stop clocksource and persistent clock
>> there is a corner case, when a driver failed to go suspend mode
>> rtc_resume() injects the sleeptime as timekeeping_rtc_skipresume()
>> returned 'false' due to which we can see mismatch in time between
>> system clock and other timers.
>>
>> Success case:
>> {sleeptime_injected=true}
>> rtc_suspend() => timekeeping_suspend() => timekeeping_resume() =>
>> rtc_resume()
>>
>> Failure case:
>> {failure in sleep path} {sleeptime_injected=false}
>> rtc_suspend() => rtc_resume()
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mukesh Ojha <mojha@...eaurora.org>
> I'm not sure this patch makes sense yet (since I don't really see how
> its used
In a system where both non-stop clocksource and rtc exist
Timestamp mismatch seen between a (Gyro)timer based on non-stop clocksource
and system clock after attempting a sleep.
Here, System clock timestamps increase by some millisecond as compare to
other timer.
And we see this is possible only when timekeeping_resume() has not been
called
which is keeping sleeptime_injected to its default value(false). So, the
call to
timekeeping_rtc_skipresume() in rtc_resume() is false and thats ends up in
sleeptime injection via rtc_resume().
When timekeeping_resume() has not been called means one of the driver failed
during suspend in syscore_suspend() in kernel/power/suspend.c .
So if we let rtc inject the sleeptime here, we would see the timestamp
increase in case of
system clock.
> - mind cc'ing me on the patch that makes use of this?)
>
> And more problematic, the patch doesn't seem to apply to mainline.
> Could you respin and resend?
Will spin the patch again with some minor code change.
Thanks,
Mukesh
>
> thanks
> -john
Powered by blists - more mailing lists