linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.2 007/153] ext4: fix block bitmap validation when bigalloc, ^flex

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <lsq.1527677561.225630673@decadent.org.uk>
Date:   Wed, 30 May 2018 11:52:41 +0100
From:   Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC:     akpm@...ux-foundation.org, "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
        "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.2 007/153] ext4: fix block bitmap validation when
 bigalloc, ^flex_bg

3.2.102-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>

commit e674e5cbd0942b42a12106ac0be8330f4301bef4 upstream.

On a bigalloc,^flex_bg filesystem, the ext4_valid_block_bitmap
function fails to convert from blocks to clusters when spot-checking
the validity of the bitmap block that we've just read from disk.  This
causes ext4 to think that the bitmap is garbage, which results in the
block group being taken offline when it's not necessary.  Add in the
necessary EXT4_B2C() calls to perform the conversions.

Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
[bwh: Backported to 3.2: adjust context]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
 fs/ext4/balloc.c | 12 +++++++-----
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/ext4/balloc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/balloc.c
@@ -278,6 +278,7 @@ static int ext4_valid_block_bitmap(struc
 					unsigned int block_group,
 					struct buffer_head *bh)
 {
+	struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(sb);
 	ext4_grpblk_t offset;
 	ext4_grpblk_t next_zero_bit;
 	ext4_fsblk_t bitmap_blk;
@@ -297,14 +298,14 @@ static int ext4_valid_block_bitmap(struc
 	/* check whether block bitmap block number is set */
 	bitmap_blk = ext4_block_bitmap(sb, desc);
 	offset = bitmap_blk - group_first_block;
-	if (!ext4_test_bit(offset, bh->b_data))
+	if (!ext4_test_bit(EXT4_B2C(sbi, offset), bh->b_data))
 		/* bad block bitmap */
 		goto err_out;
 
 	/* check whether the inode bitmap block number is set */
 	bitmap_blk = ext4_inode_bitmap(sb, desc);
 	offset = bitmap_blk - group_first_block;
-	if (!ext4_test_bit(offset, bh->b_data))
+	if (!ext4_test_bit(EXT4_B2C(sbi, offset), bh->b_data))
 		/* bad block bitmap */
 		goto err_out;
 
@@ -312,9 +313,10 @@ static int ext4_valid_block_bitmap(struc
 	bitmap_blk = ext4_inode_table(sb, desc);
 	offset = bitmap_blk - group_first_block;
 	next_zero_bit = ext4_find_next_zero_bit(bh->b_data,
-				offset + EXT4_SB(sb)->s_itb_per_group,
-				offset);
-	if (next_zero_bit >= offset + EXT4_SB(sb)->s_itb_per_group)
+			EXT4_B2C(sbi, offset + EXT4_SB(sb)->s_itb_per_group),
+			EXT4_B2C(sbi, offset));
+	if (next_zero_bit >=
+	    EXT4_B2C(sbi, offset + EXT4_SB(sb)->s_itb_per_group))
 		/* good bitmap for inode tables */
 		return 1;