linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.2 076/153] netfilter: xt_RATEEST: acquire xt_rateest

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <lsq.1527677561.47715894@decadent.org.uk>
Date:   Wed, 30 May 2018 11:52:41 +0100
From:   Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC:     akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        "Pablo Neira Ayuso" <pablo@...filter.org>,
        "Florian Westphal" <fw@...len.de>,
        "Cong Wang" <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
        "" <syzbot+5cb189720978275e4c75@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
        "Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.2 076/153] netfilter: xt_RATEEST: acquire
 xt_rateest_mutex for hash insert

3.2.102-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>

commit 7dc68e98757a8eccf8ca7a53a29b896f1eef1f76 upstream.

rateest_hash is supposed to be protected by xt_rateest_mutex,
and, as suggested by Eric, lookup and insert should be atomic,
so we should acquire the xt_rateest_mutex once for both.

So introduce a non-locking helper for internal use and keep the
locking one for external.

Reported-by: <syzbot+5cb189720978275e4c75@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
Fixes: 5859034d7eb8 ("[NETFILTER]: x_tables: add RATEEST target")
Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Reviewed-by: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
[bwh: Backported to 3.2: adjust context]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
 net/netfilter/xt_RATEEST.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/net/netfilter/xt_RATEEST.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/xt_RATEEST.c
@@ -40,24 +40,32 @@ static void xt_rateest_hash_insert(struc
 	hlist_add_head(&est->list, &rateest_hash[h]);
 }
 
-struct xt_rateest *xt_rateest_lookup(const char *name)
+static struct xt_rateest *__xt_rateest_lookup(const char *name)
 {
 	struct xt_rateest *est;
 	struct hlist_node *n;
 	unsigned int h;
 
 	h = xt_rateest_hash(name);
-	mutex_lock(&xt_rateest_mutex);
 	hlist_for_each_entry(est, n, &rateest_hash[h], list) {
 		if (strcmp(est->name, name) == 0) {
 			est->refcnt++;
-			mutex_unlock(&xt_rateest_mutex);
 			return est;
 		}
 	}
-	mutex_unlock(&xt_rateest_mutex);
+
 	return NULL;
 }
+
+struct xt_rateest *xt_rateest_lookup(const char *name)
+{
+	struct xt_rateest *est;
+
+	mutex_lock(&xt_rateest_mutex);
+	est = __xt_rateest_lookup(name);
+	mutex_unlock(&xt_rateest_mutex);
+	return est;
+}
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xt_rateest_lookup);
 
 void xt_rateest_put(struct xt_rateest *est)
@@ -105,8 +113,10 @@ static int xt_rateest_tg_checkentry(cons
 		rnd_inited = true;
 	}
 
-	est = xt_rateest_lookup(info->name);
+	mutex_lock(&xt_rateest_mutex);
+	est = __xt_rateest_lookup(info->name);
 	if (est) {
+		mutex_unlock(&xt_rateest_mutex);
 		/*
 		 * If estimator parameters are specified, they must match the
 		 * existing estimator.
@@ -144,11 +154,13 @@ static int xt_rateest_tg_checkentry(cons
 
 	info->est = est;
 	xt_rateest_hash_insert(est);
+	mutex_unlock(&xt_rateest_mutex);
 	return 0;
 
 err2:
 	kfree(est);
 err1:
+	mutex_unlock(&xt_rateest_mutex);
 	return ret;
 }