linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.2 116/153] l2tp: do not accept arbitrary sockets

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <lsq.1527677561.861137605@decadent.org.uk>
Date:   Wed, 30 May 2018 11:52:41 +0100
From:   Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC:     akpm@...ux-foundation.org, "syzbot" <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>,
        "Guillaume Nault" <g.nault@...halink.fr>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "James Chapman" <jchapman@...alix.com>,
        "Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.2 116/153] l2tp: do not accept arbitrary sockets

3.2.102-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>

commit 17cfe79a65f98abe535261856c5aef14f306dff7 upstream.

syzkaller found an issue caused by lack of sufficient checks
in l2tp_tunnel_create()

RAW sockets can not be considered as UDP ones for instance.

In another patch, we shall replace all pr_err() by less intrusive
pr_debug() so that syzkaller can find other bugs faster.
Acked-by: Guillaume Nault <g.nault@...halink.fr>
Acked-by: James Chapman <jchapman@...alix.com>

==================================================================
BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in setup_udp_tunnel_sock+0x3ee/0x5f0 net/ipv4/udp_tunnel.c:69
dst_release: dst:00000000d53d0d0f refcnt:-1
Write of size 1 at addr ffff8801d013b798 by task syz-executor3/6242

CPU: 1 PID: 6242 Comm: syz-executor3 Not tainted 4.16.0-rc2+ #253
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
Call Trace:
 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:17 [inline]
 dump_stack+0x194/0x24d lib/dump_stack.c:53
 print_address_description+0x73/0x250 mm/kasan/report.c:256
 kasan_report_error mm/kasan/report.c:354 [inline]
 kasan_report+0x23b/0x360 mm/kasan/report.c:412
 __asan_report_store1_noabort+0x17/0x20 mm/kasan/report.c:435
 setup_udp_tunnel_sock+0x3ee/0x5f0 net/ipv4/udp_tunnel.c:69
 l2tp_tunnel_create+0x1354/0x17f0 net/l2tp/l2tp_core.c:1596
 pppol2tp_connect+0x14b1/0x1dd0 net/l2tp/l2tp_ppp.c:707
 SYSC_connect+0x213/0x4a0 net/socket.c:1640
 SyS_connect+0x24/0x30 net/socket.c:1621
 do_syscall_64+0x280/0x940 arch/x86/entry/common.c:287
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x42/0xb7

Fixes: fd558d186df2 ("l2tp: Split pppol2tp patch into separate l2tp and ppp parts")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
 net/l2tp/l2tp_core.c | 8 ++++++--
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/net/l2tp/l2tp_core.c
+++ b/net/l2tp/l2tp_core.c
@@ -1505,9 +1505,14 @@ int l2tp_tunnel_create(struct net *net,
 		encap = cfg->encap;
 
 	/* Quick sanity checks */
+	err = -EPROTONOSUPPORT;
+	if (sk->sk_type != SOCK_DGRAM) {
+		pr_debug("tunl %hu: fd %d wrong socket type\n",
+			 tunnel_id, fd);
+		goto err;
+	}
 	switch (encap) {
 	case L2TP_ENCAPTYPE_UDP:
-		err = -EPROTONOSUPPORT;
 		if (sk->sk_protocol != IPPROTO_UDP) {
 			printk(KERN_ERR "tunl %hu: fd %d wrong protocol, got %d, expected %d\n",
 			       tunnel_id, fd, sk->sk_protocol, IPPROTO_UDP);
@@ -1515,7 +1520,6 @@ int l2tp_tunnel_create(struct net *net,
 		}
 		break;
 	case L2TP_ENCAPTYPE_IP:
-		err = -EPROTONOSUPPORT;
 		if (sk->sk_protocol != IPPROTO_L2TP) {
 			printk(KERN_ERR "tunl %hu: fd %d wrong protocol, got %d, expected %d\n",
 			       tunnel_id, fd, sk->sk_protocol, IPPROTO_L2TP);