linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] soc: qcom: rpmpd: Add a powerdomain driver to model corners

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAPDyKFpuZ4s7C+Nr3NhU-A40oVw84yK7eEniO6NhHNJ3VosR-A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 30 May 2018 14:44:25 +0200
From:   Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To:     Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        collinsd@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] soc: qcom: rpmpd: Add a powerdomain driver to
 model corners

[...]

>>> +
>>> +static DEFINE_MUTEX(rpmpd_lock);
>>> +
>>> +/* msm8996 RPM powerdomains */
>>> +DEFINE_RPMPD_CORN_SMPA(msm8996, vddcx, vddcx_ao, 1);
>>> +DEFINE_RPMPD_CORN_SMPA(msm8996, vddmx, vddmx_ao, 2);
>>> +DEFINE_RPMPD_CORN_LDOA(msm8996, vddsscx, 26);
>>> +
>>> +DEFINE_RPMPD_VFC_SMPA(msm8996, vddcx_vfc, 1);
>>> +DEFINE_RPMPD_VFC_LDOA(msm8996, vddsscx_vfc, 26);
>>> +
>>> +static struct rpmpd *msm8996_rpmpds[] = {
>>> +       [0] = &msm8996_vddcx,
>>> +       [1] = &msm8996_vddcx_ao,
>>> +       [2] = &msm8996_vddcx_vfc,
>>> +       [3] = &msm8996_vddmx,
>>> +       [4] = &msm8996_vddmx_ao,
>>> +       [5] = &msm8996_vddsscx,
>>> +       [6] = &msm8996_vddsscx_vfc,
>>> +};
>>
>> It's not my call, but honestly the above all macros makes the code
>> less readable.
>
> This is all static data per SoC. The macros will keep the new additions
> needed for every new SoC to a minimal. Currently this supports only
> msm8996.

Right, that's fine then.

>
>>
>> Anyway, I think you should convert to allocate these structs
>> dynamically from the heap (kzalloc/kcalloc), instead of statically as
>> above.

However, I assume this is still doable!?

[...]

>>> +       for (i = 0; i < num; i++) {
>>> +               if (!rpmpds[i])
>>> +                       continue;
>>> +
>>> +               rpmpds[i]->rpm = rpm;
>>> +               rpmpds[i]->pd.power_off = rpmpd_power_off;
>>> +               rpmpds[i]->pd.power_on = rpmpd_power_on;
>>> +               pm_genpd_init(&rpmpds[i]->pd, NULL, true);
>>
>> Question: Is there no hierarchical topology of the PM domains. No
>> genpd subdomains?
>
> The hierarchy if any is all handled by the remote core (RPM in this case).
> For Linux its just a flat view.

Okay, thanks for clarifying!

Kind regards
Uffe