[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180530133444.ovy3gtc7m6yoxcw2@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2018 14:34:45 +0100
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>,
Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>,
Matt Turner <mattst88@...il.com>,
Vineet Gupta <vgupta@...opsys.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com>,
Albert Ou <albert@...ive.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 00/16] atomics: API cleanups
On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 12:23:12PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> -#ifdef atomic64_andnot
> -/* atomic64_fetch_andnot_relaxed */
> +#ifndef atomic_andnot
> +#define atomic_andnot(i, v) atomic_and(~(int)(i), (v))
> +#endif
Ugh; s/atomic/atomic64 here.
I've pushed out a corrected branch.
Mark.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists