[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180530151327.GA13951@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2018 08:13:27 -0700
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: dmapool: Check the dma pool name
On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 08:14:09PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
> On 30 May 2018 at 20:01, Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 07:28:43PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
> >> It will be crash if we pass one NULL name when creating one dma pool,
> >> so we should check the passing name when copy it to dma pool.
> >
> > NAK. Crashing is the appropriate thing to do. Fix the caller to not
> > pass NULL.
> >
> > If you permit NULL to be passed then you're inviting crashes or just
> > bad reporting later when pool->name is printed.
>
> I think it just prints one NULL pool name. Sometimes the device
> doesn't care the dma pool names, so I think we can make code more
> solid to valid the passing parameters like other code does.
> Or can we add check to return NULL when the passing name is NULL
> instead of crashing the kernel? Thanks.
No. Fix your driver.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists