[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180530155044.GR6920@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2018 16:50:44 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc: David Collins <collinsd@...eaurora.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] regulator: dt-bindings: add QCOM RPMh regulator
bindings
On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 07:54:47AM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
> On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 3:37 AM, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
> > I'm confused as to why we are specifying the maximum current the device
> > can deliver in a given mode in the DT - surely that's a fixed property
> > of the hardware?
> Said another way: you're saying that you'd expect the "max-microamps"
> table to have one fewer element than the listed modes? So in the
> above example you'd have:
No, I'm saying that I don't know why that property exists at all. This
sounds like it's intended to be the amount of current the regulator can
deliver in each mode which is normally a design property of the silicon.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists