[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <38d49beb-a5dd-29de-3e4b-3dde67fdc28d@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2018 15:46:49 -0400
From: Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
Cc: zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, sgrubb@...hat.com,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, linux-audit@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] audit: Implement audit_log_tty()
On 05/29/2018 05:07 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 4:11 PM, Stefan Berger
> <stefanb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>>
>> +void audit_log_tty(struct audit_buffer *ab, struct task_struct *tsk)
>> +{
>> + struct tty_struct *tty = audit_get_tty(tsk);
>> +
>> + audit_log_format(ab, " tty=%s", tty ? tty_name(tty) : "(none)");
>> + audit_put_tty(tty);
>> +}
> Perhaps I missed it, but your IMA patches only ever call this to log
> current's tty, yes? If so, I would prefer if we dropped the
> task_struct argument and always had audit_log_tty() use current.
Done.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists