[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VdFZcNMMt6aRWicCozMJ+wfAyJ4ajegHCgNg2X-x_KN_A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2018 10:18:46 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Alan Cox <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
alek.du@...el.com
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/2] printk: Enable platform to provide a early boot clock
On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 12:20 PM, Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com> wrote:
> Currently printk timestamp mostly come from the sched_clock which
> depends on the clock setup, so there are many kernel logs started
> with "[ 0.000000] " before the clock is calibrated.
>
> This patch will provide an debug option for specific platform to
> provide a early boot time clock, so that we can have time info in
> kernel log much earlier, which can show the time info for the early
> kernel boot, and make boottime tuning/optimization easier (boot time
> is critical for phone/tablet and embedded devices).
>
> Capable platform only need to setup the "boot_printk_clock_fn"
> which could return time in nano seconds.
>
> Together with a TSC patch on x86 system, we have easily captured
> some early boottime killer like unwind_init() which takes about
> 300ms in boot phase.
> +static u64 printk_clock(void)
> +{
> + /* If platform provides early boot printk clock, then use it */
> + if (unlikely(system_state == SYSTEM_BOOTING && boot_printk_clock_fn))
> + return boot_printk_clock_fn();
> + else
> + return local_clock();
'else' is redundant.
> +}
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists