linux-kernel - Re: [alsa-devel] Timeout issues in wait_for

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <s5hr2ls6yg5.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
Date:   Thu, 31 May 2018 10:06:50 +0200
From:   Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
To:     "Zengtao (B)" <prime.zeng@...ilicon.com>
Cc:     "perex@...ex.cz" <perex@...ex.cz>,
        "alsa-devel@...a-project.org" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] Timeout issues in wait_for_avail function

On Thu, 31 May 2018 09:43:10 +0200,
Zengtao (B) wrote:
> 
> Hi Takashi:
> 
> Thank you for your reply.
> 
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Takashi Iwai [mailto:tiwai@...e.de]
> >Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2018 6:40 PM
> >To: Zengtao (B) <prime.zeng@...ilicon.com>
> >Cc: perex@...ex.cz; tiwai@...e.com; alsa-devel@...a-project.org;
> >linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> >Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] Timeout issues in wait_for_avail function
> >
> >On Mon, 07 May 2018 12:49:34 +0200,
> >Zengtao (B) wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi perex and tiwai:
> >>
> >> I have met a timeout case when capture audio from snd-usb-audio
> >> device, when the host call the pcm_read and get into the wait_for_avail
> >function.
> >> The following happends
> >> 1.  No available data for capture(maybe because of the late response
> >> audio data by the uac device)
> >
> >Hrm, in the case of capture, the data must be available.
> >If it's not the case, something is wrong.
> >
> >> 2.  The current thread falls into sleep state and no one wakes up it.
> >> 3.  The current thread will sleep 10s(schedule_timeout(1000)) and then
> >wakeup.
> >>
> >> I have two question about the wait_for_avail:
> >> 1. The timeout value too long, is it a reasonable value?
> >> 2. Is there any mechanism to wake up the thread if there is data from the
> >hw.
> >
> >The scenario above shouldn't happen, so no need for discussion.
> >Rather we should check why it's woken up even though no data is available.
> >
> 
> It really happens on my platform, and anyway 10 seconds timeout seems
> not a reasonable value.

The timeout isn't about guaranteeing anything.  It's merely a
last-resort safeguard.  So it *has to* be long, per definition.

That is, if you hit this timeout, it means that something is already
wrong.  In that case, fix the real cause instead of tweaking the
timeout.


Takashi

> And I don't there is any guarantee that there must be avail
> data when we reach wait_for_avail, in fact, inside the wait_for_avail, there is branch
> when no data is available.
> 
> >You can check the tracepoints to see the action of PCM stream, and confirm
> >whether it's really no data, or it's just lost by some reason (or looks as if so).
> >
> I trace the data flow, we reach the wait_for_avail function before the usb snd data arrives, 
> so we wait until 10 seconds timeout. 
> 
> >
> >Takashi
> 
> 
> Regards
> Zengtao