[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ae114f01-4b09-bb1c-fb92-6152486a896f@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2018 04:35:31 -0400
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, qing.huang@...cle.com,
tariqt@...lanox.com, haakon.bugge@...cle.com,
yanjun.zhu@...cle.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
gi-oh.kim@...fitbricks.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4] mlx4_core: allocate ICM memory in page size chunks
On 05/31/2018 02:54 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Tue 29-05-18 23:49:59, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 05/29/2018 11:44 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> And I will add this simple fix, this really should address your initial concern much better.
>>>
>>> @@ -99,6 +100,8 @@ static int mlx4_alloc_icm_pages(struct scatterlist *mem, int order,
>>> {
>>> struct page *page;
>>>
>>> + if (order)
>>> + gfp_mask |= __GFP_NORETRY;
>>
>> and also gfp_mask &= ~__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM
>
> JFTR the latter one makes __GFP_NORETRY pointless. Non sleeping allocations
> are not retrying.
Hi Michal
Since when this rule is applied ?
These GFP flags change all the time, I suggest mm experts to cleanup existing call sites ?
I merely copied/pasted from alloc_skb_with_frags() :/
Thanks !
Powered by blists - more mailing lists