linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] ARM: dts: Add generic interconnect target module node for MCAN

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2361da91-659d-1aaa-0ab8-d1473bc3a71a@ti.com>
Date:   Thu, 31 May 2018 15:51:04 +0530
From:   Faiz Abbas <faiz_abbas@...com>
To:     Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
CC:     <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        <bcousson@...libre.com>, <paul@...an.com>, <t-kristo@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] ARM: dts: Add generic interconnect target module
 node for MCAN

Hi,

On Wednesday 30 May 2018 08:34 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Faiz Abbas <faiz_abbas@...com> [180530 14:12]:
>> The ti-sysc driver provides support for manipulating the idlemodes
>> and interconnect level resets.
> ...
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra76x.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra76x.dtsi
>> @@ -11,6 +11,25 @@
>>  / {
>>  	compatible = "ti,dra762", "ti,dra7";
>>  
>> +	ocp {
>> +
>> +		target-module@...2c00000 {
>> +			compatible = "ti,sysc-dra7-mcan";
>> +			ranges = <0x0 0x42c00000 0x2000>;
>> +			#address-cells = <1>;
>> +			#size-cells = <1>;
>> +			reg = <0x42c01900 0x4>,
>> +			      <0x42c01904 0x4>,
>> +			      <0x42c01908 0x4>;
>> +			reg-names = "rev", "sysc", "syss";
>> +			ti,sysc-mask = <(SYSC_OMAP4_SOFTRESET |
>> +					 SYSC_DRA7_MCAN_ENAWAKEUP)>;
>> +			ti,syss-mask = <1>;
>> +			clocks = <&wkupaon_clkctrl DRA7_ADC_CLKCTRL 0>;
>> +			clock-names = "fck";
>> +		};
>> +	};
>> +
>>  };
> 
> Looks good to me except I think the reset won't do anything currently
> with ti-sysc.c unless you specfify also "ti,hwmods" for the module?
> 
> Can you please check? It might be worth adding the reset function to
> ti-sysc.c for non "ti,hwmods" case and that just might remove the
> need for any hwmod code for this module.
> 

If I understand correctly, this involves adding a (*reset_module) in
ti_sysc_platform_data and defining a ti_sysc_reset_module() in ti-sysc.c
similar to ti_sysc_idle_module(). Right?

Thanks,
Faiz