linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 8/9] PM / Domains: Add support for multi PM domains per device to genpd

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6dce0c20-f17f-b1be-6654-4bd7ff6f9b62@nvidia.com>
Date:   Thu, 31 May 2018 11:48:21 +0100
From:   Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
To:     Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
CC:     "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        Todor Tomov <todor.tomov@...aro.org>,
        Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>,
        "Viresh Kumar" <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
        "Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 8/9] PM / Domains: Add support for multi PM domains per
 device to genpd


On 31/05/18 11:44, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 31 May 2018 at 10:03, Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 31/05/18 07:17, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>>> +/**
>>>>> + * genpd_dev_pm_attach_by_id() - Attach a device to one of its PM domain.
>>>>> + * @dev: Device to attach.
>>>>
>>>> Can you update the description of the above as well?
>>>
>>> Yes, like below?
>>>
>>> genpd_dev_pm_attach_by_id() - Associate a device with one of its PM domains.
>>> @dev: The device used to lookup the PM domain.
>>
>> Yes perfect.
> 
> I assume I can consider this as an ack and tested by tag, both for
> patch 8 and 9?

Yes you can.

Cheers
Jon

-- 
nvpublic