linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] PCI: dwc: Rework MSI callbacks handler

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ba3df388-9ec1-fe87-e575-0eddc5a565b7@ti.com>
Date:   Thu, 31 May 2018 16:24:52 +0530
From:   Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
To:     Gustavo Pimentel <gustavo.pimentel@...opsys.com>,
        <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
        <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>, <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
        <adouglas@...ence.com>, <jesper.nilsson@...s.com>
CC:     <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] PCI: dwc: Rework MSI callbacks handler

Hi,

On Thursday 17 May 2018 10:39 PM, Gustavo Pimentel wrote:
> Remove duplicate defines located on pcie-designware.h file already
> available on /include/uapi/linux/pci-regs.h file.
> 
> Add pci_epc_set_msi() maximum 32 interrupts validation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo Pimentel <gustavo.pimentel@...opsys.com>
> ---
> Change v1->v2:
>  - Nothing changed, just to follow the patch set version.
> 
>  drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>  drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.h    | 11 --------
>  drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epc-core.c  |  3 ++-
>  3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c
> index e5f2377..a4baa0d 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c
> @@ -246,29 +246,38 @@ static int dw_pcie_ep_map_addr(struct pci_epc *epc, u8 func_no,
>  
>  static int dw_pcie_ep_get_msi(struct pci_epc *epc, u8 func_no)
>  {
> -	int val;
>  	struct dw_pcie_ep *ep = epc_get_drvdata(epc);
>  	struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_ep(ep);
> +	u32 val, reg;
> +
> +	if (!ep->msi_cap)

Ah, msi_cap is used here.
> +		return 0;

return -EINVAL.
>  
> -	val = dw_pcie_readw_dbi(pci, MSI_MESSAGE_CONTROL);
> -	if (!(val & MSI_CAP_MSI_EN_MASK))
> +	reg = ep->msi_cap + PCI_MSI_FLAGS;
> +	val = dw_pcie_readw_dbi(pci, reg);
> +	if (!(val & PCI_MSI_FLAGS_ENABLE))
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> -	val = (val & MSI_CAP_MME_MASK) >> MSI_CAP_MME_SHIFT;
> +	val = (val & PCI_MSI_FLAGS_QSIZE) >> 4;
> +
>  	return val;
>  }
>  
> -static int dw_pcie_ep_set_msi(struct pci_epc *epc, u8 func_no, u8 encode_int)
> +static int dw_pcie_ep_set_msi(struct pci_epc *epc, u8 func_no, u8 interrupts)
>  {
> -	int val;
>  	struct dw_pcie_ep *ep = epc_get_drvdata(epc);
>  	struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_ep(ep);
> +	u32 val, reg;
>  
> -	val = dw_pcie_readw_dbi(pci, MSI_MESSAGE_CONTROL);
> -	val &= ~MSI_CAP_MMC_MASK;
> -	val |= (encode_int << MSI_CAP_MMC_SHIFT) & MSI_CAP_MMC_MASK;
> +	if (!ep->msi_cap)
> +		return 0;

return -EINVAL.
> +
> +	reg = ep->msi_cap + PCI_MSI_FLAGS;
> +	val = dw_pcie_readw_dbi(pci, reg);
> +	val &= ~PCI_MSI_FLAGS_QMASK;
> +	val |= (interrupts << 1) & PCI_MSI_FLAGS_QMASK;
>  	dw_pcie_dbi_ro_wr_en(pci);
> -	dw_pcie_writew_dbi(pci, MSI_MESSAGE_CONTROL, val);
> +	dw_pcie_writew_dbi(pci, reg, val);
>  	dw_pcie_dbi_ro_wr_dis(pci);
>  
>  	return 0;
> @@ -367,21 +376,29 @@ int dw_pcie_ep_raise_msi_irq(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, u8 func_no,
>  	struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_ep(ep);
>  	struct pci_epc *epc = ep->epc;
>  	u16 msg_ctrl, msg_data;
> -	u32 msg_addr_lower, msg_addr_upper;
> +	u32 msg_addr_lower, msg_addr_upper, reg;
>  	u64 msg_addr;
>  	bool has_upper;
>  	int ret;
>  
> +	if (!ep->msi_cap)
> +		return 0;

return -EINVAL.

Thanks
Kishon