[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <b268046f-fd9c-8a04-5fe5-adf0ae036186@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2018 09:18:09 -0500
From: Eddie James <eajames@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: linux-i2c <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Edward A. James" <eajames@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/7] drivers/i2c: Add port structure to FSI algorithm
On 05/30/2018 04:16 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-05-30 at 10:47 -0500, Eddie James wrote:
>>>> + if (!list_empty(&i2c->ports)) {
>>> My gosh, this is done already in list_for_each*()
>> No, list_for_each_entry does NOT check if the list is empty or if the
>> first entry is NULL.
> NULL is never valid for a list. It does however check for an empty list
>
> It does it implicitely in the test part of the for () statement,
> checking if the next pointer points back to the head.
Thanks Ben. My mistake on this one; I misread the macro. I will remove
the check in v9... going to wait a little for any further comments now.
Thanks,
Eddie
>
> Cheers,
> Ben.
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists