lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.11.1805311522380.13187@eggly.anvils>
Date:   Thu, 31 May 2018 15:50:36 -0700 (PDT)
From:   Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
To:     "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, Josef Bacik <jbacik@...com>,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/shmem: Zero out unused vma fields in
 shmem_pseudo_vma_init()

On Thu, 31 May 2018, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:

> shmem/tmpfs uses pseudo vma to allocate page with correct NUMA policy.
> 
> The pseudo vma doesn't have vm_page_prot set. We are going to encode
> encryption KeyID in vm_page_prot. Having garbage there causes problems.
> 
> Zero out all unused fields in the pseudo vma.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>

I won't go so far as to say NAK, but personally I much prefer that we
document what fields actually get used, by initializing only those,
rather than having such a blanket memset.

And you say "We are going to ...": so this should really be part of
some future patchset, shouldn't it?

My opinion might be in the minority: you remind me of a similar
request from Josef some while ago, Cc'ing him.

(I'm very ashamed, by the way, of shmem's pseudo-vma, I think it's
horrid, and just reflects that shmem was an afterthought when NUMA
mempolicies were designed.  Internally, we replaced alloc_pages_vma()
throughout by alloc_pages_mpol(), which has no need for pseudo-vmas,
and the advantage of dropping mmap_sem across the bulk of NUMA page
migration. I shall be updating that work in coming months, and hope
to upstream, but no promise from me on the timing - your need for
vm_page_prot likely much sooner.)

Hugh

> ---
>  mm/shmem.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/shmem.c b/mm/shmem.c
> index 9d6c7e595415..693fb82b4b42 100644
> --- a/mm/shmem.c
> +++ b/mm/shmem.c
> @@ -1404,10 +1404,9 @@ static void shmem_pseudo_vma_init(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>  		struct shmem_inode_info *info, pgoff_t index)
>  {
>  	/* Create a pseudo vma that just contains the policy */
> -	vma->vm_start = 0;
> +	memset(vma, 0, sizeof(*vma));
>  	/* Bias interleave by inode number to distribute better across nodes */
>  	vma->vm_pgoff = index + info->vfs_inode.i_ino;
> -	vma->vm_ops = NULL;
>  	vma->vm_policy = mpol_shared_policy_lookup(&info->policy, index);
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 2.17.0

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ