linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 16/21] ASoC: max98088: use match

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 1 Jun 2018 08:38:13 +0800
From:   Yisheng Xie <xieyisheng1@...wei.com>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
CC:     <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 16/21] ASoC: max98088: use match_string() helper

Hi Mark,

On 2018/6/1 0:02, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 08:25:39PM +0800, Yisheng Xie wrote:
> 
>> Anyway, Here is the cover letter of v1 and I have add v2's cover letter to you:
>>   https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/5/21/303
> 
>> Each patch in this patchset is a separate one, for what this patchset want to do
>> is use match_string() helper for echo subsystem.
> 
> For something like this it's generally easier to not send everything as
> one big series - it avoids any confusion about dependencies and there's
> no actual relationship between the patches.  Instead just sending each
> subsystem as a series or perhaps even just a bunch of separate patches
> should make things smoother.

Thanks, will take this suggestion maybe next time.

Thanks
Yisheng
>