linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1] mfd: intel-lpss: Correct names of RESETS register bits

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <09ff4b28a17ef6056f54659696ce16d97442b469.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 01 Jun 2018 10:52:40 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] mfd: intel-lpss: Correct names of RESETS register
 bits

On Wed, 2018-04-25 at 13:26 +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 06:05:12PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > According to documentation the function has 2 bits for reset
> > while iDMA 64-bit has only one.
> > 
> > Rename it accordingly. Note, there is no functional change since
> > we always handle them together.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> 
> Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>

Thanks, Mika!

Lee, anything about this one? (it's not stable material, though I don't
see it in linux-next)

-- 
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy