[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180601092933.GA3082@e108498-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2018 10:29:33 +0100
From: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@....com>
To: peterz@...radead.org, rjw@...ysocki.net,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
morten.rasmussen@....com, chris.redpath@....com,
patrick.bellasi@....com, valentin.schneider@....com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, thara.gopinath@...aro.org,
viresh.kumar@...aro.org, tkjos@...gle.com, joelaf@...gle.com,
smuckle@...gle.com, adharmap@...cinc.com, skannan@...cinc.com,
pkondeti@...eaurora.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
edubezval@...il.com, srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com,
currojerez@...eup.net, javi.merino@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 00/10] Energy Aware Scheduling
Hi,
The main new feature of this patch-set is the Energy Model framework we
discussed at OSPM. The core of it and the APIs are all implemented in
patch 03/10, so this is really where I was hoping to get some feedback.
Is the overall idea of this framework reasonable ? What do you think
about the interfaces ? Is the new config option acceptable ? And also,
is there any way I can make reviewing this patch easier ?
Thanks!
Quentin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists