[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180601132239.4421-10-christian@brauner.io>
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2018 15:22:31 +0200
From: Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: ebiederm@...ssion.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
mingo@...nel.org, james.morris@...rosoft.com,
keescook@...omium.org, peterz@...radead.org, sds@...ho.nsa.gov,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
oleg@...hat.com, Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>
Subject: [PATCH v2 09/17] signal: make sig_ignored() return bool
sig_ignored() already behaves like a boolean function. Let's actually
declare it as such too.
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>
---
v1->v2:
* unchanged
v0->v1:
* patch added
---
kernel/signal.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c
index 208e99b57e6f..e48675bd3be8 100644
--- a/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/kernel/signal.c
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ static bool sig_task_ignored(struct task_struct *t, int sig, bool force)
return sig_handler_ignored(handler, sig);
}
-static int sig_ignored(struct task_struct *t, int sig, bool force)
+static bool sig_ignored(struct task_struct *t, int sig, bool force)
{
/*
* Blocked signals are never ignored, since the
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ static int sig_ignored(struct task_struct *t, int sig, bool force)
* unblocked.
*/
if (sigismember(&t->blocked, sig) || sigismember(&t->real_blocked, sig))
- return 0;
+ return false;
/*
* Tracers may want to know about even ignored signal unless it
@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ static int sig_ignored(struct task_struct *t, int sig, bool force)
* by SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE task.
*/
if (t->ptrace && sig != SIGKILL)
- return 0;
+ return false;
return sig_task_ignored(t, sig, force);
}
--
2.17.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists