[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180601132239.4421-16-christian@brauner.io>
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2018 15:22:37 +0200
From: Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: ebiederm@...ssion.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
mingo@...nel.org, james.morris@...rosoft.com,
keescook@...omium.org, peterz@...radead.org, sds@...ho.nsa.gov,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
oleg@...hat.com, Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>
Subject: [PATCH v2 15/17] signal: make legacy_queue() return bool
legacy_queue() already behaves like a boolean function. Let's actually
declare it as such too.
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>
---
v1->v2:
* unchanged
v0->v1:
* patch added
---
kernel/signal.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c
index 8ee3e4a57117..515fa59a0e9c 100644
--- a/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/kernel/signal.c
@@ -976,7 +976,7 @@ static void complete_signal(int sig, struct task_struct *p, int group)
return;
}
-static inline int legacy_queue(struct sigpending *signals, int sig)
+static inline bool legacy_queue(struct sigpending *signals, int sig)
{
return (sig < SIGRTMIN) && sigismember(&signals->signal, sig);
}
--
2.17.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists