[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <494c2768-4ac8-7282-80dd-122add15b2bb@daenzer.net>
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2018 15:56:23 +0200
From: Michel Dänzer <michel@...nzer.net>
To: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@...il.com>
Cc: amd-gfx list <amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Maling list - DRI developers
<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] drm/amdgpu: Add documentation for PRIME related code
On 2018-06-01 03:44 PM, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 9:40 AM, Michel Dänzer <michel@...nzer.net> wrote:
>> On 2018-06-01 02:58 PM, Alex Deucher wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 12:17 PM, Michel Dänzer <michel@...nzer.net> wrote:
>>>> From: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@....com>
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@....com>
>>>
>>> Series is:
>>> Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>
>>
>> Thanks. Is it okay to merge all of these via the amdgpu tree, or should
>> I wait for an ack from Jon and/or core DRM maintainers for that?
>
> GPU documentation usually goes through the drm trees. You might want
> to push patch 1 (drm_mm.rst fix) via drm_misc, but the rest are can go
> in via the amdgpu tree since they are amdgpu specific.
I'd prefer merging all three patches together, since without patch 1,
patch 3 generates the warning below while generating documentation, and
the reference to the PRIME Buffer Sharing section doesn't work.
.../linux/Documentation/gpu/amdgpu.rst:2: WARNING: undefined label:
prime_buffer_sharing (if the link has no caption the label must precede
a section header)
--
Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.amd.com
Libre software enthusiast | Mesa and X developer
Powered by blists - more mailing lists